No argument. Its probably a bad idea to hackback, unless you are reasonably certain that:
a) you are the toughest kid on the playground; or
B) you have nothing left to lose, because it is a matter of life or death.
Much like in the real-world. Which begs the question:
Why are we still stuck in the 90’s mentality that what happens on the Internet is not IRL?
- Kids are committing suicide over cyber-bullying.
- Businesses go bankrupt because of cybercrime.
- Your company is probably paying Millions to protect itself from network crime, terror, hacktivists and state sponsored espionage. Probably way more than it pays for physical security.
Can we agree that this is a real problem, not an imaginary one, where a cyber bully flicks your cyber ear, and you cyber respond with a cyber insult? Instead a real person did something really bad to you using the dangerous weapon attached to his keyboard, and you have to demonstrate an immediate ability to protect yourself, or the bad guy will do it again. This is real life, and there are real losses, do you hire armed, or unarmed cybersecurity guards to mitigate your risk?